[phenixbb] phenix.pdb_as_cif

jp d yoyoq at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 14 10:21:58 PST 2015


hi,of course, i should have included the versionphenix.version_1.9-1692

the pdb has done more digging and included this comment

"Aside from the asym_id, there is another way we use for the mapping, 
_atom_site_anisotrop.id should map(for ANSIO) to _atom_site.id(for ATOM).

This is one-by-one match for each atom. If you look at the file, you see that in the ATOM section, you have
 ATOM 99999 N3 . U . 367 ? -23.56200 29.36600 106.68800 1.000 135.52000 N ? UC ? 11964 1
 ATOM 100000 C4 . U . 367 ? -23.35700 30.62600 106.16100 1.000 133.22000 C ? UC ? 11964 1

But in the ANISO section, you have
 99999 N3 . U . 367 ? 2.04230 1.43260 1.67410 -0.19220 -0.28280 -0.16500
 A0000 C4 . U . 367 ? 2.00150 1.41600 1.64420 -0.1 8730 -0.28010 -0.16450
i.e. the atom No. after 99999 is inconsistent between the two sections. The ANISO should use 100000.
"
thanksjpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20150114/dcfd89aa/attachment.htm>


More information about the phenixbb mailing list