[phenixbb] refinement with anomalous data
pafonine at lbl.gov
Fri Feb 6 11:29:43 PST 2015
If data set isn't anomalous then I don't see why you would want to
refine against I+/I-.
On 2/6/15 11:26 AM, Guangyu Zhu wrote:
> What I meant is: I actually don’t have anomalous signal, so when I use
> I+/I-, kind of like I use Imean twice for each reflection. Can I do
> that? My guess is that the resolution is low, so double
> reflection/parameter ratio really benefits the refinement, although
> overall the weight for x-ray term is not change, because rms bond and
> angle are similar.
> Newer versions are better for my other refinement with higher
> resolution, but not this data set.
> From: Pavel Afonine <pafonine at lbl.gov <mailto:pafonine at lbl.gov>>
> Date: Friday, February 6, 2015 at 2:12 PM
> To: Guangyu Zhu <gzhu at hwi.buffalo.edu <mailto:gzhu at hwi.buffalo.edu>>,
> "phenixbb at phenix-online.org <mailto:phenixbb at phenix-online.org>"
> <phenixbb at phenix-online.org <mailto:phenixbb at phenix-online.org>>
> Subject: Re: [phenixbb] refinement with anomalous data
>> I use same data set for refinement, so Rfree is also marked for same
>> reflection. The only difference is that I chose “Data labels” from
>> Phenix IMEAN or I(+) I(-).
> What I meant is that the IMEAN set is not the same as I(+),I(-) at
> least because the number of reflections in IMEAN is not the same as in
>> By the way, I use version 1.8.2 for refinement. Newer versions gives
>> higher R/Rfree.
> Should be the other way around...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the phenixbb