[phenixbb] Find peaks and holes documentation
mortengroftehauge.work at gmail.com
Thu Aug 22 09:26:57 PDT 2013
Thank you for the quick reply.
I am quite okay with not everything being documented from top to bottom. I
found it weird that the GUI documentation wasn't linked up in the
And I think an easier hack would be to write in the error message:
Example syntax is the simplest way to explain anything.
But I just tried it and I get
Sorry: Couldn't find the file reflections.hkl=hklf3
On 22 August 2013 17:02, Nathaniel Echols <nechols at lbl.gov> wrote:
> PS. You will still need R-free flags to use this program. I have no idea
> if the XPREP output includes these, or whether the =hklf3 hack will still
> allow them to be detected, but if not, you will need to specify those as a
> separate file:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Nathaniel Echols <nechols at lbl.gov> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Morten Grøftehauge <
>> mortengroftehauge.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> So first the missing manual. If I google it I get this page
>>> http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/find_peaks_holes.htm which
>>> is for the GUI. When I go back to the documentation
>>> http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/phenix_documentation.html I
>>> can't find the link for it (which is also why I was using Google to find it
>>> in the first place). I also checked the source to see if the link was
>>> somehow misnamed.
>> The manual isn't "missing", I simply don't have time to cover every
>> single advanced feature in every section, and the behavior is fundamentally
>> the same as at least a dozen other programs (with respect to SHELX files,
>> anyway). So far you're the first person to ask about command-line use.
>> Anyway, running it from the command line with default settings is not
>>> phenix.find_peaks_holes model.pdb reflections.hkl
>>> but I run into this error message
>>> Sorry: Unresolved amplitude/intensity ambiguity:
>>> SHELX reflection files may contain amplitudes or intensities.
>>> Please append =amplitudes
>>> or =hklf3
>>> or =intensities
>>> or =hklf4
>>> to the file name argument or parameter to resolve the ambiguity.
>>> and I don't how to do that. If I add .hklf3 at the end of the file
>>> name I get the same error. If I go reflections.hkl=hklf3 I just get a
>>> message that I need to supply a reflection file.
>>> What is the syntax?
>> phenix.find_peaks_holes model.pdb
>> The same applies to most other programs which produce a similar error
>> message. This is a little confusing, I agree. I think it's mostly a
>> historical issue of the order in which various components of Phenix were
>> written. Thinking about it a little bit, I think I can hack the code to
>> handle just "reflections.hkl=hklf3" as a special case.
>> I still find it inexplicable that in 2013 there are programs which are
>> still restricted to outputting a format which is fundamentally broken when
>> so many others are available. We try to support any input format in
>> Phenix, but there are limits to how much time we can invest in compensating
>> for this.
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the phenixbb