Antony.Oliver at sussex.ac.uk
Sat Mar 26 03:06:47 PDT 2011
I have had some personal off-line communication with the PDB about the
current policy on zero-occupancy atoms.
I thought it would be useful to disseminate the information to the wider
I have just taken the key points and listed them below...(hopefully
without changing the intended meaning!)
>>> The PDB deprecates the use of zero occupancy atoms - but they are
certainly allowed - they are annotated in remark 475 if present.
>>> The preferred action is for them to be removed and then the missing
atoms are documented in remark 470.
>>> At no point should this be imposed on the authors - it is by
>>> The policy is just a preference not an enforced change to the
>>> you can check the policies at the wwPDB
>>> search for the section Zero occupancy residues (REMARK 475) and atoms
>>> which indicates that zero occupancy atoms are allowed in the format.
I keenly await the (hopefully) consensus opinion on what we, as
crystallographers, should do with residues with poor or absent side-chain
Dr Antony W. Oliver
Senior Research Fellow
Cancer Research UK DNA Repair Enzymes Group
Genome Damage and Stability Centre
Science Park Road
University of Sussex
email: antony.oliver at sussex.ac.uk
tel (office): 01273 678349
tel (lab): 01273 677512
More information about the phenixbb