[phenixbb] multi-xtal averaging vs twinning
Frank von Delft
frank.vondelft at sgc.ox.ac.uk
Tue Jun 23 03:31:57 PDT 2009
Oh -- the argument being that it's not the phases that are twinned?
Peter Zwart wrote:
> < snip >
>> Or how *would* one approach this?
> Basic MR / refinement, guided by plain phenix.multi_crystal_average
> phases without anything special I guess ...
> (Like you indicate basically).
> Make sure that indexing between datasets is consistent (try something
> like phenix.xtriage native.sca reference.data.file=semet.sca).
> Lowish CC's can be explained by non-isomorphism issues as well as
> different twin fractions in different xtals.
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
More information about the phenixbb