[phenixbb] "Negative reflections" (previously Are sigma cutoffs for R-free reflections cheating?)

[Pavel Afonine]

HI Sacha,

thanks, it may -:) I tried to read it 6 years ago, so I might need to
refresh my memory. And again, it's not too relevant to my questions.

All the best!
Pavel.

On 12/4/09 11:06 PM, Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV wrote:
> Hi, Ed and Pavel,
>
> > No, of course. I was just wondering how better (and what is
> > "better" in this case) the refinement results will be if one
> includes the
> > negative (zero) reflections into the process of refinement, and did
> > anyone clearly demonstrate it.
>
> Can the work below help your discussion?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sacha
>
> =============
>
> /Acta Cryst./ (1978). A*34*, 517-525[ doi:10.1107/S0567739478001114
> <http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0567739478001114> ]
>
>
>       On the treatment of negative intensity observations
>
>
>       S. French
>       <http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/citedin?search_on=name&author_name=French,%20S.>
>       and K. Wilson
>       <http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/citedin?search_on=name&author_name=Wilson,%20K.>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20091205/ce5e6541/attachment-0003.htm>