[phenixbb] A few questions

Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] CSCHUBER at prdus.jnj.com
Wed Feb 6 09:29:54 PST 2008


Hi Chris,

to my knowledge SHELX is the only programs available wich handles these situations correctly. Since you have very good resolution SHELX may be (arguably) the better choice at this point until Pavel is done with the implementation. 

Cheers,

	Carsten

> -----Original Message-----
> From: phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org
> [mailto:phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org]On Behalf Of Rife,
> Christopher L
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 12:15 PM
> To: PHENIX user mailing list
> Subject: Re: [phenixbb] A few questions
> 
> 
> In that case, then the occ of alt conf's tends to refine to 
> greater than 1:
> ATOM    523 SE  AMSE A  32      23.654  11.792   6.216  0.56 
> 14.04          Se
> ATOM    530 SE  BMSE A  32      23.570  12.284   6.796  0.46 
> 13.91          Se
> 
> And, if I use "group_occupancy" plus H's, then all the 
> residues refined to an occ of 0.99!
> ATOM     30  N   ILE A   3      29.050  25.113   4.183  0.99  
> 8.48           N
> 
> It's fairly confusing...
> 
> In the end it seemed that the best option was to not include 
> any occupancy refinement...
> 
> Chris 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org 
> [mailto:phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org] On Behalf Of Peter Zwart
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:02 AM
> To: PHENIX user mailing list
> Subject: Re: [phenixbb] A few questions
> 
> I guess what is needed is not individual occupancy refinement, but
> 'grouped' occupancy refinement:
> 
> http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/refinement.htm#anch106
> 
> HTH
> 
> Peter
> 
> 2008/2/6, Paul Adams <PDAdams at lbl.gov>:
> > Hi Pavel,
> >
> >    the occupancy should be the same for all of the atoms in an
> > alternate conformation (grouped occupancy refinement). I 
> doesn't make
> > chemical sense for bonded atoms to have different occupancies.
> >
> >    Cheers,
> >         Paul
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Pavel Afonine wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Christopher,
> > >
> > > thanks for your questions!
> > >
> > >> We are working on a refinement at 1.14A which was suffering from
> > >> lots of NPD atoms when refined anisotropically with 
> refmac5 and/or
> > >> shelx.
> > >
> > > The implementation of anisotropic B-factors refinement in
> > > phenix.refine
> > > should never lead to non-positive definite ADP matrices or any
> > > "instability" in refinement.
> > >
> > >> 1. In our model we have a few solvent ligands, and these show up
> > >> in the log file as:
> > >>           Unusual residues: {'EDO': 11, ' CL': 1, 'SO4': 1}
> > >>           Classifications: {'undetermined': 13, 'water': 437}
> > >> We've used a cif file for EDO with H's when needed, but still see
> > >> this message. Is this normal? What is unusual?
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, it is normal. In this context "unusual" means that 
> this is not
> > > "usual amino acid, water, dna/rna fragment".
> > >
> > >> 2. When choosing "indivdual_occupancies" for the refinement, all
> > >> the atoms within an alt-conf are refined to different 
> occupancies-
> > >> is this expected? It seems that all atoms in the A conf should
> > >> have the same value, and the occ of all atoms in the B 
> conf should
> > >> also be the same. Instead, we see this:
> > >> ATOM    232  CA AGLU A  28      26.163   7.163   4.422  0.77
> > >> 6.73           C
> > >> ATOM    233  CB AGLU A  28      24.851   7.269   3.672  0.80
> > >> 9.27           C
> > >> ATOM    234  CG AGLU A  28      24.978   6.767   2.259  0.66
> > >> 12.91           C
> > >> ATOM    235  CD AGLU A  28      23.662   6.717   1.554  1.00
> > >> 16.51           C
> > >> ATOM    236  OE1AGLU A  28      22.874   7.667   1.757  0.71
> > >> 18.78           O
> > >> ATOM    237  OE2AGLU A  28      23.429   5.733   0.803  0.60
> > >> 16.77           O
> > >> ATOM    240  CA BGLU A  28      26.140   7.156   4.424  0.23
> > >> 6.33           C
> > >> ATOM    241  CB BGLU A  28      24.794   7.230   3.713  0.20
> > >> 6.48           C
> > >> ATOM    242  CG BGLU A  28      24.877   6.766   2.280  0.34
> > >> 6.55           C
> > >> ATOM    243  CD BGLU A  28      23.536   6.702   1.598  0.00
> > >> 7.53           C
> > >> ATOM    244  OE1BGLU A  28      23.497   7.014   0.381  0.29
> > >> 7.85           O
> > >> ATOM    245  OE2BGLU A  28      22.543   6.341   2.280  0.40
> > >> 8.40           O
> > >>
> > >
> > > This is correct behavior and this is exactly what you 
> should expect
> > > refining occupancies of atoms in alternative 
> conformations: the sum of
> > > occupancies of conformation A and B must be one. So, in your
> > > example above:
> > >
> > > ATOM 232 CA AGLU A 28 26.163 7.163 4.422 0.77 6.73 C
> > > ...
> > > ATOM 240 CA BGLU A 28 26.140 7.156 4.424 0.23 6.33 C
> > >
> > > the total occupancy is: 0.77+0.23=1
> > > Same for other atoms.
> > >
> > >> 3. Adding hydrogens during anisotropic refinement results in the
> > >> Parvati server giving "Illegal Biso" errors for many of the
> > >> hydrogens.
> > >
> > > The H atoms at normal resolutions (not subatomic resolution) are
> > > treated
> > > as a special case. For example (default behavior), they 
> ride on bonded
> > > atoms during coordinates refinement (riding model, 
> distances X-H do
> > > not
> > > change), we refine one occupancy and isotropic B-factor per all H
> > > atoms
> > > in your molecule, etc. I don't know what exactly "Illegal Biso"
> > > means in
> > > Parvati server, but most likely you want to exclude H 
> atoms for this
> > > analysis.
> > >
> > > Just a suggestion: at resolution 1.4A you can try to change the
> > > default
> > > behavior for H refinement to this:
> > >
> > >   hydrogens {
> > >     refine_adp = *one_b_per_residue one_b_per_molecule individual
> > >     refine_occupancies = *one_q_per_residue one_q_per_molecule
> > > individual
> > >   }
> > >
> > > Please let us know if you have any questions or problems!
> > > Pavel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > phenixbb mailing list
> > > phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> > > http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> >
> > --
> > Paul Adams
> > Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence
> > Berkeley Lab
> > Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley
> > Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute
> > Head, Berkeley Center for Structural Biology
> >
> > Building 64, Room 248
> > Tel: 510-486-4225, Fax: 510-486-5909
> > http://cci.lbl.gov/paul
> >
> > Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
> > 1 Cyclotron Road
> > BLDG 64R0121
> > Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
> > --
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > phenixbb mailing list
> > phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> > http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> >
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> 
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> 
> 




More information about the phenixbb mailing list